Profile
Yogesh Tiwari
DevOps & SRE Lead in Hyderabad. About seven years across Linux, Windows Server, Kubernetes and AWS/Azure.
Roles
- 01Solution architectMulti-region feasibility study for a freight platform: 13 blockers ranked, phased warm-standby design.→
- 02System designerThree products designed from requirements to deployment, solo.→
- 03DevOps engineerGated CI/CD, rollback by re-tagging an image with no rebuild, Terraform and CDK.→
- 04SRESLOs and 70 monitors as code; root-cause analysis of a deploy outage that blocked three environments.→
- 05Cloud engineerAWS end to end, plus 38 cost recommendations worth about 30% of a non-prod account forecast.→
- 06Platform engineerOn-prem Kubernetes at IdeyaLabs, hybrid estates, a Proxmox/KVM home lab.→
Toolbox
- Cloud
- AWSECS FargateLambdaRDS / AuroraSQSS3CloudFrontCognitoDMSAzureFinOps
- Platforms
- Kubernetes (on-prem)OpenShift (lab)DockerProxmox / KVMLinuxWindows ServerIIS / .NET
- IaC and delivery
- TerraformAWS CDKGitHub ActionsGitLab CECodePipelinegated releasesrollback drills
- Observability and SRE
- PrometheusGrafanaLokiZabbixDatadogCloudWatchSLOs as codeRCA
- Data and backup
- PostgreSQLMariaDBRedisVeeamDuplicatiAWS BackupDR design
- Build
- PythonTypeScriptGoSQLBashFastAPINodeReactNext.jspfSense
Timeline
Jun 2026 – present
DevOps & SRE Lead
IdeyaLabs · Hyderabad
Platform and reliability for Hadara, an on-premises Kubernetes platform, and delivery for a serverless AWS data pipeline.
~6.7 years, until Jun 2026
Senior Infrastructure & Cloud Engineer
Osmosys Software Solutions
Linux and Windows Server across hybrid estates, backup and DR, monitoring, database operations.
2021 – 2024
BCA, Cloud Computing
Chandigarh University
Certifications
| Certification | Status |
|---|---|
| Microsoft MS-900 · Microsoft 365 Fundamentals | ACHIEVED |
| CKA · Certified Kubernetes Administrator | IN PROGRESS |
| Microsoft AZ-500 · Azure Security Engineer | IN PROGRESS |
| Microsoft AZ-305 · Azure Solutions Architect Expert | EXAM SCHEDULED |
| AWS SAA-C03 · Solutions Architect Associate | PLANNED |
How I work
Eight habits that show up in every case file on this site. The right-hand column is where to check them.
| Habit | What it means in practice | Where it shows |
|---|---|---|
| Read-only first | Inventory the live account, prove the blast radius, take a backup, get approval, then change. Nothing is deleted on a hunch. | Both client audits started from the live accounts, not the repositories. The tax platform's storage clean-up followed that order. |
| Every change has an undo | The rollback is written and, where possible, drilled before the change runs. Releases keep the previous image tagged. | Re-tag rollback in the tax platform; a production credential rotated without an outage; staging moved to ECS in small, reversible days. |
| Verify, don't trust the tool | A report, a diagram or a console tile is a claim. The account, the logs and the metrics are the evidence. | Where code and account disagree, the case file says so, for example the CDK-defined Amplify app against the live web host. |
| Say what is not built | Every claim carries a status: delivered, in progress, planned or proposed. Dashed boxes mean exactly that. | Status tables on both case files; the warm-standby region is drawn dashed because it is a proposal. |
| Measure reliability, not activity | Alerts exist to protect an objective. Monitors, SLOs and dashboards live in code, so they are reviewed like any other change. | 70 Datadog monitors and 4 SLOs defined in Terraform, alongside CloudWatch alarms and canaries. |
| Name the gap to the standard | For each platform I write down where it is today, where an enterprise would hold it, and rank the gap by risk. | A “Today versus the enterprise standard” table on each case file, and 13 ranked blockers to active/active. |
| Cost is a reliability input | Savings are found by inventory and checked against usage, because the cheapest fix is the one that does not break anything. | 38 cost recommendations worth about 30% of a non-prod account forecast; snapshot storage cut by 79%. |
| Write it down | Decisions, runbooks and trade-offs are recorded, so the next engineer does not need me in the room. | Audit trails on the products, and the numbered plans behind the client work. |